Jesus Est Né En Provence: The New Theory that Jesus was Born in France
Introduction
Jesus Est Né En Provence is a new theory that suggests that Jesus was not born in Bethlehem, but in the South of France. This theory is based on the work of Robert Ambelain, a French historian and esotericist who published his findings in 1973.
Ambelain's theory is based on a number of factors, including the presence of early Christian symbols in the region, the existence of a cave in the village of Roquefort-les-Pins that is said to have been the birthplace of Jesus, and the fact that the name "Jesus" is derived from the Celtic word "Iesu," which means "healer."
The Evidence for the Theory
There is a growing body of evidence to support the theory that Jesus was born in France. This evidence includes:
- The presence of early Christian symbols in the region, such as the cross, the fish, and the lamb.
- The existence of a cave in the village of Roquefort-les-Pins that is said to have been the birthplace of Jesus.
- The fact that the name "Jesus" is derived from the Celtic word "Iesu," which means "healer."
- The discovery of a number of ancient texts that support the theory, including the Gospel of Mary Magdalene and the Gospel of Thomas.
The Implications of the Theory
The theory that Jesus was born in France has a number of implications. If true, it would mean that:
- The traditional Christian story of Jesus' birth is inaccurate.
- Jesus was not a Jew, but a Celt.
- The center of Christianity is not in the Middle East, but in Europe.
Conclusion
The theory that Jesus was born in France is a fascinating one that has the potential to change our understanding of Christian history. While there is still much debate surrounding the theory, the evidence that supports it is growing. If true, this theory would have a profound impact on our understanding of Christianity and its origins.
Comments